9.3 History of the Juvenile Justice System
Alison S. Burke; Kate McLean; and Michelle Holcomb
The first juvenile court was created in Cook County, Illinois, in 1899, but the concept of a separate system for juveniles dates back to seventeenth-century Europe. The term parens patriae originated in the 12th century, with the English monarchy and literally means “the father of the country.” Applied to juvenile matters, parens patriae means the government is responsible for, and in charge of everything, involving youth (Merlo, 2019). Within the scope of early English common law, parents had the primary responsibility of raising their children in any manner they deemed fit. However, when children reached 7 years of age or committed a criminal act, chancellors, acting in the name of the king, adjudicated matters concerning the youth. The youth had no legal rights and were essentially wards of the court. As such, the courts were tasked with safeguarding their welfare. While parents were merely responsible for childbearing, the state had the primary and legitimate interest in the upbringing of the children (Merlo, 2019).
The concept of parens patriae had a substantial influence on events in the United States, such as the child-saving movement, houses of refuge, and reform schools. The persistent doctrine of parens patriae can be seen evolving from “king as a father” to a more general ideology, that of the state “acting in the best interest of the child.” Subsequent matters involving youth revolve around this notion of acting in the best interest of the child, whether children were taken away from wayward parents, sent to reform schools for vagrancy, or even held in institutions until they reached the age of majority. The idea is that the state is acting in their best interest, protecting the youth from growing up to be ill-prepared members of society. Thus, the courts may intervene for the youth’s own good.
In the nineteenth century, a popular understanding of children as vulnerable, and in need of special care, developed alongside the intertwined phenomena of urbanization, immigration, and industrialization. These forces gave rise to a flourishing number of abandoned, unsupervised, and/or impoverished children in major cities. Many times their parents – sometimes newly-arrived immigrants – were occupied for long hours by factory labor. In turn, the first house of refuge was established in New York City in 1824. Houses of refuge, more generally, were urban establishments used to corral youth who were roaming the street unsupervised or who had been referred by the courts (Merlo, 2019). These houses were not intended to house criminals but rather at-risk youth, or youth who were on the verge of falling into a life of crime because of their social circumstances. Because of the notion of parens patriae, many of the parents of these youth were not involved in the placement of their children in these houses. The case of Ex Parte Crouse is an example.
In 1838, a girl named Mary Ann Crouse was sent to a Philadelphia house of refuge at the request of her mother. Her father petitioned to have her released, since she was committed without his consent. However, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied the father’s petition on the grounds that the state has the right to remove children from their home if it’s in their best interest and even sometimes over parental objection (because of parens patriae). The court declared that failed parents lose their rights to raise their children. Parental custody and control of their children is natural but is not an absolute right. If parents fail to care for their children, educate, train, or supervise them, then the children can be taken by the state under the principle that the state is acting in the best interest of the child. Two other juvenile-facing institutions of this era are described in the boxes below.
Reform Schools: The 1850s ushered in the development of reform schools or institutions used for the housing of delinquent and dependent children. The schools were structured around a school schedule rather than the work hours that defined the houses of refuge. Many reform schools operated like a cottage system, where the youth were divided into “families” with cottage parents who oversaw the day to day running of the family, discipline of the youth, and schooling. The structure is still used in some youth correctional institutions today; however, back in the nineteenth century, children were often exploited for labor, and many of the schools de-emphasized formal education (Mennel, 1973). Additionally, the emphasis of the reform school was on the strength of the family, and they believed that by reinserting a strong family presence in the lives of the youth, they would be deterred from further criminal pursuits (Shoemaker, 2018).
Child Saving Movement: By the end of the nineteenth century, cities were experiencing the effects of three major things: industrialization, urbanization, and immigration. Industrialization refers to the shift in work from agricultural jobs to more manufacturing work. This led to a greater number of people moving from the country to the cities and the cities increasing exponentially in population without the infrastructure to support the increase. Immigration refers to the internal migration of people in America and the external movement of people from other countries. Within America, people were moving from the southern states (remember, this is not long after the end of the Civil War, which ended in 1865) and immigrating from European countries such as Ireland (the potato famine lasted from 1845-1854 and killed an estimated 1.5 million people). Millions of Germans and Asians also immigrated to America during this time, lured by Midwest farmlands and the California Gold Rush. (History)
The influx of people into cities weakened the cohesiveness of communities and the abilities of communities and families to socialize and control children effectively (Feld, 2001). Nonetheless, the child-saving movement emerged during this time in an effort to change the way the state was dealing with dependent, neglected, and delinquent children. The child savers were mostly women from middle and upper-class backgrounds.
There is some debate as to the motives of the child savers. The traditional view is that they were progressive reformers who sought to solve problems of urban life, while others contend that they used their station and resources as an effort to preserve their middle-class white way of life by overseeing the treatment of the immigrant children. Regardless of their motives, it is safe to say that child-savers were prominent, influential, philanthropic women, who were “generally well educated, widely traveled, and had access to political and financial resources.” (Platt, 1977)
Creation of the Original Juvenile Court and the Juvenile Courts in Louisiana
The juvenile court was created in Cook County, Illinois in 1899. The Illinois Juvenile Court Act of 1899 was the first statutory provision in the United States to provide for an entirely separate system of juvenile justice. The court was created to have jurisdiction over all matters pertaining to youth – dependent, neglected, and delinquent youth. Other states soon followed, such as Pennsylvania in first in 1901, and Louisiana in 1908. Louisiana has four juvenile courts set up around the state. In order of establishment, the courts are Orleans Parish (1908), Caddo Parish (1922), Jefferson Parish (1958), and finally East Baton Rouge Parish (1990). The 1908 Louisiana State Legislature said, “Section 9. Be it further enacted, etc., That the Juvenile Court in the Parish of Orleans and the District Courts outside of said Parish, sitting as Juvenile Courts, shall have jurisdiction of the trial of all neglected and delinquent children, and of all persons charged with contributing to the neglect or delinquency of such children, or with a violation of any law now in existence or hereafter enacted for the protection of the physical, moral and mental well-being of such children; not punishable by death or at hard labor and of all cases of desertion or non-support of children by either parent” (Louisiana Law Library).
The king is responsible for and in charge of everything involving youth
Term for “trial” in juvenile proceedings
An urban establishment used to corral youth who were roaming the street unsupervised or who have been referred by the courts
Case where the court declared that failed parents lose their rights to raise their children