Chapter 11: The Chi-Square Distribution
11.4 Test for Homogeneity
Learning Objectives
By the end of this section, the student should be able to:
- calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity
- test for homogeneity, and draw a conclusion about whether two populations have the same distribution
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to draw a conclusion about whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence.
Note
The expected value for each cell needs to be at least five in order for you to use this test.
Hypotheses
H0: The distributions of the two populations are the same.
Ha: The distributions of the two populations are not the same.
Test Statistic: Use a [latex]{\chi }^{2}[/latex] test statistic. It is computed in the same way as the test for independence.
Degrees of Freedom (df)df = number of columns – 1
Requirements: All values in the table must be greater than or equal to five.
Common Uses: Comparing two populations. For example: men vs. women, before vs. after, east vs. west. The variable is categorical with more than two possible response values.
Example
Do male and female college students have the same distribution of living arrangements? Use a level of significance of 0.05. Suppose that 250 randomly selected male college students and 300 randomly selected female college students were asked about their living arrangements: dormitory, apartment, with parents, other. The results are shown in [link]. Do male and female college students have the same distribution of living arrangements?
| Dormitory | Apartment | With Parents | Other | |
| Males | 72 | 84 | 49 | 45 |
| Females | 91 | 86 | 88 | 35 |
Solution
H0: The distribution of living arrangements for male college students is the same as the distribution of living arrangements for female college students.
Ha: The distribution of living arrangements for male college students is not the same as the distribution of living arrangements for female college students.
Degrees of Freedom (df):
df = number of columns – 1 = 4 – 1 = 3
Distribution for the test:[latex]{\chi }_{3}^{2}[/latex]
Calculate the test statistic: χ2 = 10.1287 (calculator or computer)
Probability statement: p-value = P(χ2 >10.1287) = 0.0175
Press the MATRX key and arrow over to EDIT. Press 1:[A]. Press 2 ENTER 4 ENTER. Enter the table values by row. Press ENTER after each. Press 2nd QUIT. Press STAT and arrow over to TESTS. Arrow down to C:χ2-TEST. Press ENTER. You should see Observed:[A] and Expected:[B]. Arrow down to Calculate. Press ENTER. The test statistic is 10.1287 and the p-value = 0.0175. Do the procedure a second time but arrow down to Draw instead of calculate.
Compare α and the p-value: Since no α is given, assume α = 0.05. p-value = 0.0175. α > p-value.
Make a decision: Since α > p-value, reject H0. This means that the distributions are not the same.
Conclusion: At a 5% level of significance, from the data, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the distributions of living arrangements for male and female college students are not the same.
Notice that the conclusion is only that the distributions are not the same. We cannot use the test for homogeneity to draw any conclusions about how they differ.
Your Turn!
Do families and singles have the same distribution of cars? Use a level of significance of 0.05. Suppose that 100 randomly selected families and 200 randomly selected singles were asked what type of car they drove: sport, sedan, hatchback, truck, van/SUV. The results are shown in [link]. Do families and singles have the same distribution of cars? Test at a level of significance of 0.05.
| Sport | Sedan | Hatchback | Truck | Van/SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family | 5 | 15 | 35 | 17 | 28 |
| Single | 45 | 65 | 37 | 46 | 7 |
Solution
With a p-value of almost zero, we reject the null hypothesis. The data show that the distribution of cars is not the same for families and singles.
Example
Both before and after a recent earthquake, surveys were conducted asking voters which of the three candidates they planned on voting for in the upcoming city council election. Has there been a change since the earthquake? Use a level of significance of 0.05. [link] shows the results of the survey. Has there been a change in the distribution of voter preferences since the earthquake?
| Perez | Chung | Stevens | |
| Before | 167 | 128 | 135 |
| After | 214 | 197 | 225 |
Solution
H0: The distribution of voter preferences was the same before and after the earthquake.
Ha: The distribution of voter preferences was not the same before and after the earthquake.
Degrees of Freedom (df):
df = number of columns – 1 = 3 – 1 = 2
Distribution for the test: [latex]{\chi }_{2}^{2}[/latex]
Calculate the test statistic: χ2 = 3.2603 (calculator or computer)
Probability statement: p-value=P(χ2 > 3.2603) = 0.1959
Press the MATRX key and arrow over to EDIT. Press 1:[A]. Press 2 ENTER 3 ENTER. Enter the table values by row. Press ENTER after each. Press 2nd QUIT. Press STAT and arrow over to TESTS. Arrow down to C:χ2-TEST. Press ENTER. You should see Observed:[A] and Expected:[B]. Arrow down to Calculate. Press ENTER. The test statistic is 3.2603 and the p-value = 0.1959. Do the procedure a second time but arrow down to Draw instead of calculate.
Compare α and the p-value:α = 0.05 and the p-value = 0.1959. α < p-value.
Make a decision: Since α < p-value, do not reject Ho.
Conclusion: At a 5% level of significance, from the data, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the distribution of voter preferences was not the same before and after the earthquake.
Your Turn!
Ivy League schools receive many applications, but only some can be accepted. At the schools listed in [link], two types of applications are accepted: regular and early decision.
| Application Type Accepted | Brown | Columbia | Cornell | Dartmouth | Penn | Yale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regular | 2,115 | 1,792 | 5,306 | 1,734 | 2,685 | 1,245 |
| Early Decision | 577 | 627 | 1,228 | 444 | 1,195 | 761 |
We want to know if the number of regular applications accepted follows the same distribution as the number of early applications accepted. State the null and alternative hypotheses, the degrees of freedom and the test statistic, sketch the graph of the p-value, and draw a conclusion about the test of homogeneity.
Solution
H0 : The distribution of regular applications accepted is the same as the distribution of early applications accepted.
Ha : The distribution of regular applications accepted is not the same as the distribution of early applications accepted.
df = 5
χ2 test statistic = 430.06
Press the MATRX key and arrow over to EDIT. Press 1:[A]. Press 3 ENTER 3 ENTER. Enter the table values by row. Press ENTER after each. Press 2nd QUIT. Press STAT and arrow over to TESTS. Arrow down toC:χ2-TEST. Press ENTER. You should see Observed:[A] and Expected:[B]. Arrow down to Calculate. Press ENTER. The test statistic is 430.06 and the p-value = 9.80E-91. Do the procedure a second time but arrow down to Draw instead of calculate.
References
Data from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 2013. Available online at www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings (accessed May 24, 2013).
“Energy use (kg of oil equivalent per capita).” The World Bank, 2013. Available online at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.PCAP.KG.OE/countries (accessed May 24, 2013).
“Parent and Family Involvement Survey of 2007 National Household Education Survey Program (NHES),” U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Available online at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009030 (accessed May 24, 2013).
“Parent and Family Involvement Survey of 2007 National Household Education Survey Program (NHES),” U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Available online at http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009030_sup.pdf (accessed May 24, 2013).
